Angad Ray @ Vimal Kumar Ray @ Vimal Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9628 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2022 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Angad Ray @ Vimal Kumar Ray @ Vimal Ray S/o Sri Jagarnath Ray R/o Vill - Bagar, P.S. - Sikarhatta, Dist. - Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. case no. 133 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons came variously armed and the petitioner resorted to indiscriminate firing on the informant and others. The informant states that they somehow saved their life and escape.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case between the parties and the correct version has been narrated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9628 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 the counter case lodged by one Ram Hulas Upadhyay. The petitioner is in custody since 22.11.2023 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that not only the petitioner is named in the F.I.R but there is direct allegation against him of having resorted to firing, though injury has not been sustained as a result thereof.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R, no injury having been sustained by the informant side in the occurrence alleged together with the petitioner having remained in custody since 22.11.2023 and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Charpokhari P.S. case no. 133 of 2022, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara. (Partha Sarthy, J) Harsh/- U T