← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7984/2025allowed

Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-28Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7984 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Sinha Son of Pradeep Sinha villageRajauli, Takua Tand, Block Road Ps- Rajauli, Dist- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP.

Mr. Awadesh Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 324, 308, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have given tangi blow on the head of the informant's son, namely, Alok Kumar.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. His name has been transpired in the present case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7984 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 owing to a dispute relating to sewage water. There is an inordinate delay of 14 days in lodging the FIR, which creates serious doubt about the prosecution case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he has been languishing in custody since 06.12.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the arguments of the parties as well as the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No.508 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T