Santosh Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16894 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-425 Year-2020 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== SANTOSH RAM Son of Ram Ashish Ram, Resident of Village- Basudeopur, P.s.- Sadar, District- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.

The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur (Fekla O.P.) P.S. Case No. 425 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

So far as the maintainability of the bail petition is concerned, Section 76 (2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16894 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2022 2/2 Act, 2016 makes an explicit embargo on entertaining the application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.

Since the provision of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. is not applicable in respect of offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, as such, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed, as not maintainable.

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey , J) Mahesh/- U T