Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Kumar Kushwaha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3834 of 2026 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Kumar Kushwaha Son of Bishun Prasad, Resident of village Bagahi Baghambarpur, Ward No. 3, Patjirwa, Block and P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut at Muzaffarpur. 3.

The District Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah. 4.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, West Champaran at Bettiah. 5.

The Anchal Adhikari, Bairiya, District- West Champaran. 6.

The National Highways, through its Director, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel (04) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 21-07-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for directing the respondents authorities to make payment to the petitioner for the land sought to be acquired by the Land Acquisition Officer, West Champaran (R4) for the construction of the proposed NH-730 project (From Sevarhi to U.P.) at the present market price at which sale and purchase has been taking place

Patna High Court CWJC No.3834 of 2026(3) dt.21-07-2026 2/2 in the vicinity as evident from an illustrative saledeed dated 15.10.2024 (Annexure-P/3) and not at the rate arbitrarily indicated in the notice issued to the petitioner and his family-members in L.A. Case No. 21 of 2023-24; for payment of solatium, interest @ 9% & an additional compensation to the petitioner for the incidental damages suffered due to the acquisition including the price of the properties standing on the land-in-question; and for all other relief/s the petitioner is found entitled to in the given facts & circumstances of the case at hand."

3. On 30.03.2026, an order was passed to remove the defect(s) within a period of two weeks.

4. As it was a peremptory order and the defect(s) was not removed, it got dismissed on 15.04.2026.

5. Perused the file and the same stands consigned. (Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U