Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3467 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Sonu Kumar S/o- Chandrabhushan Prasad Singh resident of Village- Larua, P.S.- Halai, District-Samastipur.

2.

Suraj Kumar Tiwari, S/o Vijendra Tiwari resident of Village- Larua, P.S.- Halai, District-Samastipur.

3.

Himanshu Kumar Singh, S/o Dinesh Singh resident of Village- Larua, P.S.- Halai, District-Samastipur.

4.

Bhola Singh, S/o Janak Singh resident of Village- Larua, P.S.- Halai, District-Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

3.

Lokpal (Manrega), District Rural Development Agency, Samastipur. 4.

The Sub. Divisional Officer, Samastipur.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Morwa Block Office, District- Samastipur. 6.

The Programme Officer, Morwa Block Office, District- Samastipur. 7.

The Junior Engineer, Morwa Block Office, District- Samastipur. 8.

The Panchayat Technical Assistant, Morwa Block Office, DistrictSamastipur. 9.

The Panchayat Rojgar Sevak, Larua Panchayat under Morwa Block Office, District- Samastipur.

10.

The Mukhiya, Larua Panchayat under Morwa Block Office, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-02-2025 A vague petition has been filed seeking a direction to constitute an Inquiry with respect to faulty

Patna High Court CWJC No.3467 of 2025(2) dt.28-02-2025 2/2 construction of stairs in the pond.

2. No good ground has been made out by the petitioners for any interference. In fact, this Court contemplated for imposing cost for such frivolous litigation but considering the fact that the petitioners are persons of the same village where the pond is located, we refrain from doing so.

3. The petition is dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ) ( Partha Sarthy, J) Rajesh/Saurabh U