Arjun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5295 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-416 Year-2024 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Arjun Yadav S/O Kauleshwar Yadav R/O Village- Kandi (Bithosharif), P.SChandauli (Buniyadganj), Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheikh Arkan Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 416 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 109, 117(2), 74, 303(2), 351(2) & 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that co-accused including the petitioner has assaulted the informant and his family members by various means. There is allegation of assault against the petitioner upon Jitendra Yadav, brother of the informant.

4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10-11-2024. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5295 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner, rather allegation is general and omnibus in nature. Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Deepak Yadav. So far as injury caused by the petitioner is concerned, the same is found to be simple in nature. It is submitted that petitioner side has filed counter case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, injury found to be simple in nature attributed by the petitioner and no specific allegation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 416 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T