Rinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7289 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-330 Year-2021 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

RINKU DEVI WIFE OF DINESH PASWAN R/O VILLAGESULTANPUR, P.S.- DESRI, DISTRICT- VAISHALI 2.

SUNITA DEVI WIFE OF LAXAMAN PASWAN R/O VILLAGESULTANPUR, P.S.- DESRI, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that on 26.08.2021 at about 2:00 am six accused persons including the petitioners came variously armed and kidnapped her minor daughter, it is next alleged that accused persons enticed the victim and took her with an intention of marriage after locking the informant in a room where she lives alone, it is next alleged that villagers came by that time the accused had fled away.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7289 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are woman having clean antecedent and have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that petitioners are neither related to the side of the boy nor with the informant in any manner. Learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that victim was in love with Sachin Kumar with whom petitioners have no concern and being a co-villager, they have been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the victim has returned and her statement was recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has not supported the prosecution case. It is next submitted that though the said statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has not been annexed but then she has instructions to make the submission.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7289 of 2023(2) dt.24-05-2023 3/3 pending/successor court in connection with Desari P.S. Case No. 330 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T