Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7352/2019disposed

Md. Manjar @ Sabbu @ Md. Manjar Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2019-04-05Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7352 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2018 Thana- BRAHMPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== MD. MANJAR @ SABBU @ MD. MANJAR ALI, S/o Late Anwar, R/o village- Damodarpur Bara Pathian, P.S- Kanti, Dist. Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8437 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2018 Thana- BRAHMPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

MD. SHAUKAT ALI, son of Md. Anwar, Resident of Mohalla-Damodarpur P.S. Kanti, District-Muzaffarpur 2.

Md. Maqsood @ Md. Masood Raza, son of Md. Shamim, Resident of Mohalla-Mehdi Hasan Chowk, P.S.-Barhampura. District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7352 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8437 of 2019) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Petitioners in both the case seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Barahampura P.S. Case No. 212 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 407/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and later on Section 302 IPC was added.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7352 of 2019(3) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 At the very outset, learned APP has pointed out that in this case process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has already been exhausted against the petitioners in both the case, which will appear from paragraphs 219 and 225 of the case diary. Heard learned APP and learned counsel for the informant.

In view of the above fact, let petitioners in both the case, above named, surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order.

With the above observation, both the applications stand disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T