Shravan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2084 of 2024 ====================================================== Shravan Kumar S/o Late Raj Nandan Prasad, R/o Village - Aliganj, Malathi, P.S. - Ghosi, District Jehanabad.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Director General cum Commander General, Home Guards and Fire Services, Bihar, Patna.
4.
Inspector General of Police cum Director, Home Guards and Fire Services, Bihar, Patna.
5.
Deputy Inspector General of Police cum State Fire Officer, Patna, Home Guards and Fire Services Bihar, Patna.
6.
Deputy Inspector General of Police (Personnel and Welfare Division), Patna, Bihar, Bihar Police Headquarter, Patna.
7.
Assistant State Fire Officer, Patna, Home Guards and Fire Services, Bihar, Patna.
8.
Senior District Commander cum District Fire Officer, Patna. 9.
Conducting Officer cum Senior District Commander Cum District Fire Officer, Nalanda.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Standing Counsel 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-02-2024
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. For directing the Respondent No. 3 (Director General cum Commander General, Home Guards and Fire Services, Bihar, Patna) to decide the Memorial Appeal dated 20.12.2022, preferred by the petitioner against District Fire
Patna High Court CWJC No.2084 of 2024(2) dt.29-02-2024 2/2 order No. 221, contained in Memo No. 4255 dated 15.12.2022 passed by Senior District Commander cum District Fire Officer, Patna, in accordance with law and within reasonable time."
2. At the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition, to which the learned counsel for the respondent-State has got no objection.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U