Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10536/2026allowed

Naresh Kamat @ Naresh Kumar Kamat v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10536 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2025 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Naresh Kamat @ Naresh Kumar Kamat Son of Sri Surya Dev Kmat Resident of Village - Parwa, Ward No. 09, P.S. - Jaynagar, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Soban Asghar. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.307 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from the possession of this petitioner, one country made pistol, two live cartridges and a mobile were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The seizure list witnesses

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10536 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the seizure. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 307 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T