Samim Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8102 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Samim Ansari, S/O Amsul Ansari, Resident of Village- Naya Tol Dubahi Bazar, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Soban Asghar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 103(2) of B.N.S..
3. The case of the prosecution in short is that the petitioner along with 25 other named accused persons, arrived at the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi, danda, farsa, sword, due to which some of the persons got seriously injured. In the last part, it is submitted that Sattar Ansari died while he was being rushed to D.M.C.H.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8102 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The nature of the allegation are general and omnibus. No specific overt act is alleged against him. No specific weapon is attributed to him. It has also been submitted that similarly situated other co-accused persons, namely, Sakina Khatoon and Sakila Khatoon have already been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 88935 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.09.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T