← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2761/2019disposed

Mohan Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-06-18Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2761 of 2019 ====================================================== Mohan Kumar Mandal aged about 35 years Male, S/o Sri Gangadar Mandal @ Gangan Mandal, resident of Village and Post- Jaso, P.S. Basopatti, DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, District Madhubani 3.

The District Supply Officer, District Madhubani. 4.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Jainagar, District- Madhubani. 5.

Gulam Azdani S/o Abdul Rauf resident of Village- Mehtarpatti, P.O.- Birpur, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Tiwary For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S Raza Ahmad (AAG 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 18-06-2019 It appears that the writ application was filed prematured against the mere recommendation made to the selection committee. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage he has got information that during pendency of the writ application the District Level Selection Committee has already accepted the recommendation and selection made in accordance with law. The person who has been selected is not a party in the writ application.

Learned counsel for the State submits that in case the petitioner will have any grievance against the selection made by the District Level Selection Committee he has got adequate

Patna High Court CWJC No.2761 of 2019(2) dt.18-06-2019 2/2 remedy by filing appropriate appeal in terms of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016. In the aforesaid view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ application with a liberty to avail such other remedy which may be available to him in accordance with law.

This application is, thus, disposed of as not pressed with liberty as sought for.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U