Bir Bahadur Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9473 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-570 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Bir Bahadur Kumar S/o Late Ramnirit Yadav @ Ramnrit Yadav R/o vill - Ganesh Bigha, P.S.- Karauna, Distt.- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate Mr. Roop Kishan, Advocate Mr. Parashuram Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 117(2), 118(2), 110, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 27.11.2025. It is further submitted that informant alleges that she is a pension-holder and her son (petitioner) on 24.06.2025 was quarreling with her for money when her daughter-in-law (Neelam) came and assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing injury over her eyes.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9473 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 manifest that informant is the mother of the petitioner and alleges that petitioner was quarreling with her for money when her daughter-in-law came and assaulted her. It is further submitted that there is no specific allegation of assault against the petitioner. It is next submitted that if the privilege of regular bail is granted to the petitioner, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial to prove his innocence.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Jehanabad (Karauna) P.S. Case No. 570 of 2025. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T