Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17824/2021allowed

Golu Yadav @ Vivek Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-28Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17824 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2019 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Golu Yadav @ Vivek Kumar Yadav S/O Sanjeev Yadav R/O Village-Pirrahi, P.S-Alauli, District-Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mrityunjay Kumar Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Alauli P.S. Case No. 204 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Earlier the bail application of petitioner was rejected vide order dated 10.07.2020. This is second attempt. It is submitted that in para 3 of petitioner it is stated that petitioner is accused in five more cases, but he is on bail in all those cases. It is further submitted that charge has been framed on 15.10.2020 and petitioner is in custody since 29.07.2019.

Considering the fact that charge has already been framed and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17824 of 2021(2) dt.28-07-2021 2/2 is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 204 of 2019, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below. (ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T