← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/537/2016disposed

Ragini Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-04The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.537 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Ragini Kumari Wife of Mukesh Kumar Singh and daughter of Om Narayan Mehta, Resident of Village- Kutubpur Police Station Bidupur District Vaishali at Hajipur at Present residing at Village- Sultanpur Koiri Tola PS Danapur District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Director General of Police Bihar Patna.

3. The Ispector General of Police Patna.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

6. The Additional Superintendent of Police, Danapur Patna.

7. The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur.

8. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur.

9. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali Hajipur.

10. Mukesh Kumar Singh Son of Deo Narayan Singh Resident of VillageKutubpur (Adal Badi) Police Station- Bidupur District Vaishali at Hajipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh (Gp-31) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 04-07-2016 Heard Mr. Ravi Shankar Pankaj, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mrs. Binita Singh, learned Government Pleader No.31, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.537 of 2016 (2) dt.04-07-2016 2/2 In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U t