← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1910/2025allowed

Rajeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-06Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1910 of 2025 ====================================================== Rajeshwar Singh Son Late Paras Singh, Resident of Village- Sandha Newaji Tola, P.S- Muffasil, District- Saran Bihar 841301. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

3.

The Deputy Secretary, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar.

4.

The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, Bihar. 5.

The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra (Saran), Bihar. 6.

The Finance Officer, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra Saran, Bihar. 7.

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chhapra (Saran), Bihar. 8.

The Principal Yadunandan College, Dighwara, Chhapra (Saran), Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 For the University : Mr. Bindhayachal Rai, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the University.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's case is squarely covered by judgment dated 13.11.2024 passed in C.W.J.C. No.16104 of 2024.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the impugned pay verification certificate issued vide Receipt No. 0908220300098,

Patna High Court CWJC No.1910 of 2025(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 under the signature of the authorized officer, Pay Verification Cell, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna (Annexure-P/4) is hereby quashed and the matter is remanded back to the State authorities for proceeding afresh in accordance with law.

4. It goes without saying that the petitioner is entitled to receive pay as earlier.

5. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U