Umesh Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6783 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2021 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

UMESH DAS Son of Late Thakur Das Resident of Village - Tarar, P.S. Sanhaula, District - Bhagalpur.

2.

Parmil Das @ Parmila Devi W/o Umesh Das Resident of Village - Tarar, P.S. Sanhaula, District - Bhagalpur.

3.

Klpana Devi D/o Krishna Das Resident of Village - Tarar, P.S. Sanhaula, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Pratima Devi W/o Amitabh Kumar Das @ Manchun Das, D/o Umesh Das Resident of Village - Tarar, P.S. Sanhaula, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 124 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, the marriage of the informant Pratima Devi was solemnized with co-accused, Amitabh Kumar Das in the year 2017 and the accused persons subjected her to cruelty for non-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6783 of 2022(2) dt.25-08-2022 2/2 fulfillment of demand of rupees five lacs as dowry. They also attempted to kill her by pouring kerosene oil. Ultimately she was ousted from her matrimonial house.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner No. 2 is mother-in-law, petitioner No. 3 is sister-in-law and petitioner No. 1 Umesh Das is father-in-law of the informant. They have no concern with the day to day affairs of the couple. On the other hand, the learned Addl.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhagalpur in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 124 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) SONALI/niku/- U T