Pankaj Chandra Banshi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.464 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2018 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ======================================================
1. Pankaj Chandra Banshi
2. Tej Kahar ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr.Kamla Kant Pandey For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2019 Heard the parties.
The appellants seek anticipatory bail in connection with Sasaram Registered Case No. 326 of 2018, arising out of Chenari P.S.Case No. 229 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 504, 385 and 379 of the I.P.C. and Sections 3(2) (r) (s)/3(2) (za) of SC/ST Act.
Allegation as per F.I.R. against the appellants is that they along with others accused persons abused the informant by naming his caste and assaulted and snatched the key of Tractor and demanded Rs. 10,000/- as ransom. Submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and there is a case and counter case in between the parties and land dispute is
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.464 of 2019(3) dt.05-03-2019 2/2 prevailing in between the parties but nothing specific allegation has been attributed against the appellants.
Heard learned Special P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside, let the appellants, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- ( Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in Registered case No. 326 of 2018 arising out of Chenari P.S.Case No. 229 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr. P. C.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/- U T