Raj Kishor @ Raj Kishor Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6042 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raj Kishor @ Raj Kishor Kumar Son of Maharaj Mahto R/o VillageMahadeo Tola Madhubani, P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 308(2), 303(2), 324(4), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant has alleged that on 17.03.2025 at about 4:30 PM, while supervising PCC work on the Melwa-Madhubani road carried out by Vijay Champaran Construction Pvt. Ltd., a group of persons, namely Jairam Prasad, Mola Kumar, Amit Kumar, Anuj Kumar, Pramod, Raj Kishore (petitioner), along with 2-3 unknown, came together and started destroying the newly constructed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6042 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 road. When he objected, co-accused - Jairam Prasad stabbed him in the neck with a knife, co-accused - Anuj Kumar struck his head with a rod, and the others assaulted him be means of sticks. During the attack, co-accused - Amit Kumar stole his mobile phone, co-accused - Pramod took Rs. 5,000/- from his pocket, and Raj Kishore (petitioner) snatched his gold chain.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case due to village politics. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner of assaulting anyone. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he snatched the golden Hanumani from the neck of the informant. A statement has been made in para 3 of the bail application that petitioner has clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6042 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 Dhaka, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 86 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., as also with the condition that one of the bailors should be close relative of the petitioner.
(S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Ankit Kumar/- U T