Rangila Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12343 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2018 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Rangila Kumari Chhote Lal Sahni Resident of Village-Narhar, P.S.- Hathouri, District -Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Chunchun Sahni son of Late Ramchandra Sahni 3.

Lal Babu Sahni son of Late Ramchandra Sahni 4.

Raju Sahni son of Late Ramchandara Sahni 5.

Ram Sresth Sahni son of Late Ramchandra Sahni 6.

Sujit Kumar son of Chaneshwar Sahni 7.

Lakshmi Sahni son of Chandeshwar Sahni 8.

Ram Jappu Sahni son of Kapal Sahni 9.

Bishun Sahni son of Late Mahendara Sahni 10.

Jai Ram Kumar son of Bishun Sahni 11.

Santosh Sahni son of Shiv Sharan Sahni 12.

Balbindra Kumar son of Shiv Sharan Sahni 13.

Chathroo Sahni son of Pukar Sahni All residents of Village-Narhar, P.S.- Hathouri, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2019 This application has been filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos.2 to 13 vide order dated 05.12.2018 passed in A.B.P. No.3665 of 2018 by the learned 11th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur. Ground for cancellation of bail of opposite party nos.2 to 13 is that the learned 11th Additional Sessions Judge,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12343 of 2019(2) dt.01-03-2019 2/2 Muzaffarpur, has granted anticipatory bail on the ground that there is case and counter case between the parties and also there is no injury on the record, whereas the informant had treated at SKMCH, Muzaffarpur, that has not been called for. During the course of argument, when the informant asked to supply the injury report, he could not supply to show that injuries were serious or grievous.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to opposite party nos.2 to 13, however, if anything comes on the record showing any grievous or dangerous injury to the informant, she will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bonds of opposite party nos.2 to 13 to the court below itself.

Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amjad/- U T