Dinesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6388 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2025 Thana- ISMAILPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Son of Jairam Mandal Resident of Village - Ismailpur, P.S.- Ismailpur, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ismailpur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that unknown miscreants have looted Rs. 43,000/- in cash from the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one Anil Kumar Thakur has given his confessional statement in which the name

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6388 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 of this petitioner has surfaced. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He also submits that co-accused namely, Anil Kumar Thakur has already been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 88638 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 17.09.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Naugachia, Bhagalpur in connection with Ismailpur P.S. Case No. 168 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T