Dinesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10420 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-550 Year-2022 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Dinesh Sah Son of Late Dev Narayan Sah R/O-Village- Mathiya, PSBikarmaganj, District- Rohtas 2.

Devanti Devi Wife of Dinesh Sah R/O-Village- Mathiya, PS- Bikarmaganj, District- Rohtas 3.

Amrendra Kumar Son of Dinesh Sah R/O-Village- Mathiya, PSBikarmaganj, District- Rohtas 4.

Arti Devi Wife of Amrendra Kumar R/O-Village- Mathiya, PSBikarmaganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Priyanka Devi Wife of Late Harendra Kumar R/O-Village- Mathiya, PSBikarmaganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Krishna Nishant, Adv.

Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala For O.P. No. 2 :

Mr.Varun Krishna Singh, Adv.

Mr.Venkatesh Kaushik, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 550 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468 & 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The husband of the complainant died in an accident. The allegation against the petitioners is of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10420 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 misappropriating the pension granted after death of husband of the complainant.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners are father-in-law, mother-inlaw, brother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the complainant.

5. It has jointly been submitted that the matter has been compromised. The report of the learned mediator is also on record, along with the compromise entered into between the parties.

6. Learned counsel for the informant has fairly admitted that the entire amount, mentioned in the compromise petition, has been received by the informant.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to terms and conditions of the compromise, the informant had to withdraw the cases against the petitioners, to which the learned counsel for the informant assured that those cases will be withdrawn soon.

8. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10420 of 2025(3) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 550 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T