Golu Kumar @ Golu Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6692 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-200 Year-2021 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Golu Kumar @ Golu Prasad Son Of Dilip Ram @ Dilip Prasad. 2.

Roushan Kumar, Son of Ajeet Singh.

Both R/O Village- Ranipur Chakiya, P.S.- Bypass, Ditrict- Patna ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikalp, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Bypass P.S. Case No. 200 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 37(c) of the Bihar Excise Prohibition Act.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6692 of 2022(2) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T