← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40716/2015rejected

Santosh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-12-01Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40716 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2014 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Santosh Singh son of Dileshwar Singh resident of village - Bangaliya, Police Station - Mansi, District - Khagaria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Rab (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 191 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly 12 accused persons including the petitioner surrounded the house of the informant and the petitioner shot the wife of the informant causing her death.

Submission is of false implication due to land dispute. Title Suit No. 77 of 2013 is already going on between the parties. The informant is himself veteran criminal and he has killed his father also for which Chautham P.S. Case No. 89 of 2000 was

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40716 of 2015 (3) dt.01-12-2015 2/2 registered. Other co-accused Bablu Singh and Subhash Singh have already been allowed bail vide order dated 10.04.2015 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 8343 of 2015 with Criminal Misc. No. 9397 of 2015 and, as such, the petitioner suffering in custody since 25.02.2015, deserves sympathetic consideration. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the assailant. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner is the assailant, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, prayer stands rejected. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U