← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7179/2018disposed

Aman v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-04Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7179 of 2018 ====================================================== Aman Son of Late Sita Ram Paswan, Resident of Village-Basudeopur, ViaNaraga, Police Station-Kalyanpur, District-Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar,Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Buxar 4.

The District Education Officer, Buxar.

5.

The Block Education Officer, Buxar Block, District Buxar. 6.

The Head Master, Government Elementary School Kardausi, Buxar, 7.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

8.

The District Education Officer, Begusarai, 9.

Block Education officer, Nawkothi Block, District Begusarai, ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Choudhary Shyam Nandan For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kr. Roy No. 1- Sc13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 04-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to consider his case for compassionate appointment. The father of the petitioner died-inharness on 05.01.2015 while he was working on the post of Headmaster. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted application for compassionate appointment and the same is pending at the level of the respondents on account of indecisiveness and ongoing

Patna High Court CWJC No.7179 of 2018(2) dt.04-07-2019 2/2 correspondence of respondent nos. 3 and 7. The idea behind compassionate is to provide social security to tide over the financial crisis occasioned on account of sudden death of the bread earner of the family. The aforesaid object behind the compassionate appointment has been ignored by the respondents. Delay is usually seen in the matter of taking decision for compassionate appointment.

Considering the fact that application for compassionate appointment was made in the year 2015, the Court directs the respondents including respondent no.3 and respondent no.7 to take appropriate decision with regard to the claim of the petitioner for compassionate appointment at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U