Menka Sah @ Menka Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8112 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2022 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Menka Sah @ Menka Devi W/O Ramesh Sah, D/O Achhelal Sah VillageTajpur(Tola Tand), P.S- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra- 841206 2.

Santosh Kumar Shah @ Santosh Sah S/O Shankar Sah Village- Tajpur(Tola Tand), P.S- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra- 841206 3.

Ravi Kumar Sah @ Patel Sah S/O Shankar Sah Village- Tajpur(Tola Tand), P.S- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra- 841206 4.

Shankar Shah S/O Late Bhuteli Sah Village- Tajpur(Tola Tand), P.S- Janta Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra- 841206 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 354B, 379 and other ancillary sections of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners started digging inside the purchased land of the informant with a view to erect wall and on protest they assaulted informant side as a result of which three persons sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8112 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/2

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that due to land dispute minor scuffle took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case. Doctor has found simple injury. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of all the petitioners is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let these petitioners, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Saran at Chapra in Janta Bazar Police Station Case No. 112 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T