Sonu Kumar @ Bijali Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6294 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-360 Year-2018 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== 1.
SONU KUMAR @ BIJALI YADAV Son of Late Maheshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Shekhpur, Chaman Gosai Tola, P.S.- Uda-Kishunganj, District- Madhepura 2.
Dilkhush Kumar @ Dilkhush Kumar Yadav Son of Janeshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Shekhpur, Chaman Gosai Tola, P.S.- Uda-Kishunganj, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Pawan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 04-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, registered in connection with Uda-Kishunganj P.S.Case No. 360 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated on the accusation of firing made by the accused persons. The accusation is general and omnibus in nature without any specific overt act attributed individually. In any event no injury whatsoever has been caused to any one. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6294 of 2020(2) dt.04-03-2020 2/3 petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of petitioners' arrest or surrender before court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Uda-Kishunganj, Madhepura in connection with UdaKishunganj P.S. Case No. 360 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners.
(ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6294 of 2020(2) dt.04-03-2020 3/3 reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) HR/- U T