Most. Pawan Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12185 of 2016 =========================================================== Most. Pawan Devi Wife of Late Raj Kumar Jha, resident of village- Kawilpur, Post- Laheriasarai, Police Station- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna 2.
The Chief Engineer,Water Resources Department, Muzaffarpur 3.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani 4.
The Executive Engineer, Western Koshi Canal, Division No-2 Jainagar, District-Madhubani 5.
The Executive Engineer, Tirhut Canal Division, Motipur, Camp- Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur 6.
The Director, Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Patna 7.
The Treasury Officer, Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga 8.
The Provident Fund Officer, Madhubani 9.
The Treasury Officer, Muzaffarpur.
10. The Provident Fund Officer,Muzaffarpur
11. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate.
For the State :
Mr. Brajesh Kumar, AC to AAG-4 For the Accountant General :
Mr. Satyendra Kumar Jha, Advocate.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 17-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The writ application has been filed seeking a direction to the authorities to pay Rs. 3,91,189/- as admissible Provident Fund, with statutory interest.
Learned counsel for the State submits, that as per his telephonic instructions from respondent no. 10, authority has been issued of the amount and sent to the concerned Treasury Officer for
Patna High Court CWJC No.12185 of 2016 dt.17-09-2016 2/2 payment, on 27.07.2016.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no information with regard to payment.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed off with a direction to the respondents no. 7, 9 and 10 to ensure that the Provident Fund amount of the petitioner is paid to her, with up-todate statutory interest, if not already paid, within four weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order before them. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar U