Ravi Shankar Tanto @ Ravi Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17555 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2020 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Ravi Shankar Tanto @ Ravi Prasad Son Of Late Naresh Tanto Resident Of Village- Balia Kothi, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas 2.

Ram Bachan Ram @ Ram Bachan Prasad @RAM Bachan Tanto Son Of Angrahit Ram Resident Of Village- Nawadhih, P.S.- Karakat, DistrictRohtas 3.

Dev Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar @ Devi Kumar @ Bisendar Son Of Harihar Tanto Resident Of Village- Balia Kothi, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas 4.

Sukhnandan Tanto Son Of Late Sri Govind Tanto Resident Of Village- Balia Kothi, P.S.- Nasariganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Nasariganj P.S. Case no. 97 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 308, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in nutshell is that petitioners have assaulted the informant and his family members with lathi due to which they became injured and also snatched his money, mobile phone and golden chain from his wife and fled away

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17555 of 2021(2) dt.21-12-2021 2/2 when villagers chased them.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. From perusal of the impugned order dated 04.12.2020 there is no specific mention that what is the nature of injury sustained by the informant side. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties as annexed at Annexure-2. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer of bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Nasariganj P.S. Case No.

97 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM- III, Rohtas, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.