Bali Bhuiyan @ Lulha @ Dilip Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7711 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Bali Bhuiyan @ Lulha @ Dilip Bhuiyan son of Late Fakirchand Bhuiyan Resident of Village -Mohabbtapur PS -Sherghati Distt -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard Mr. Paras Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that while the informant was alone in her house along with her children, seven criminal entered into her house overpowered her on the point of arms and they took altogether Rs. 91,000/- from their CSP Center.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was remanded in this case from Gurua P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025, wherein he has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7711 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 given his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement of the petitioner, there is nothing against him. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 08.05.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned trial court. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T