Patna High CourtCR. REV./128/2023disposed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.128 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-658 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH YADAV @ VIKASH KUMAR YADAV S/O GULTAN YADAV @ PRABHASH KUMAR Resident of village- Kanp (Madhepura Tola), P.S.- Sour Bazar, District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Surendra Mohan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. By filing this revision application, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 08.03.2022 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Kishore), Purnea in Special (Kishore) Case No. 08/2021, CIS No. 08/2021 arising out of K. Hat P.S. Case No. 658 of 2018 registered under Sections 302, 224, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner has got 25 criminal antecedents on his head.

3. Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 29.08.2022 in Cr. Rev.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.128 of 2023(4) dt.13-10-2023 2/2 No. 248 of 2022.

4. It appears that this Court refused to interfere with the order dated 08.03.2022 which was challenged in Cr. Rev. No. 248 of 2022. The petitioner has once again challenged the same order in the present revision application.

5. In the opinion of this Court, once the impugned order was upheld by this Court in Cr. Rev. No. 248 of 2022 and no liberty was reserved to the petitioner to move this Court afresh on expiry of certain period, the present revision application against the same impugned order cannot be maintained.

6. The petitioner, if so advised, may file a fresh application in the learned trial court itself.

7. This criminal revision application is disposed of accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rishi/- U T