Dheeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8537 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2023 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Dheeraj Kumar Son of Amirak Mandal Resident of Village-Achardih, P.S.- Sikandra, Distt.-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3.

The case has been registered under Sections 341, 323, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, but then from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no one was injured. 4.

The learned APP also submits that from perusal of the case diary, it manifests that there is no injury report on record.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the case has been instituted under the Arms Act also and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8537 of 2024(3) dt.19-04-2024 2/2 there is allegation of firing but then no one was injured which amply demonstrates that in order to give seriousness to the case, allegation of firing has been alleged. It is next submitted that petitioner has antecedent of one case and is languishing in judicial custody since 15-9-2023. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the trial. 6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

7.

Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 244 of 2023.

8.

However, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bonds of the petitioner in the event, if it comes to a conclusion that petitioner after being released on bail is trying to delay the trial in any manner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T