← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3724/2019disposed

Kumar Navin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-02-26Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran,Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3724 of 2019 ====================================================== Kumar Navin, aged about 44 years (Male), S/o- Ram Anugarh Prasad, Resident of Mohalla-Gomati Nagar, P.S- Devas, District- Devas (Madhya Pradesh) at present Resident of Village- Murgiachak, P.S-Warisaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Principal Secretary, the Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.

The Director Agriculture Department,Bihar, Patna 5.

The District Magistrate, Nawada 6.

The District Agriculture Officer, Nawada 7.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Nawada 8.

The Block Development Officer, Block - Warisaliganj, District- Nawada 9.

The Block Agriculture Officer, Block- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada 10.

The Station Head Officer, P.S- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada 11.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AG 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 26-02-2019 Heard the parties.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the report of the Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada to the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department endorsing the financial irregularities complained of by the petitioner has not been acted upon by the State and hence, the writ petition in Public Interest.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3724 of 2019(2) dt.26-02-2019 2/2 Learned Counsel for the petitioner has made reference to the statement made by the beneficiaries which stands noted in the report of Deputy Development Commissioner to submit that some irregularities noted is confirmed.

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties and in the nature of the issue raised, we deem it proper to direct the respondent no. 3, the Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department to consider the grievance of the petitioner as raised herein in the background of the report of the Deputy Development Commissioner, Nawada enclosed at Annexure-2 to the writ petition and take it to a logical conclusion within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

This disposes of the writ petition.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Archana/ Surendra/- ( Arvind Srivastava, J) U