Sujeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6202 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-526 Year-2020 Thana- AGAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Sujeet Kumar S/O Vinod Yadav R/O Village- Panchvati Nagar, Bazar Samiti, P.S- Bahadurpur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, some unknown persons assaulted the security guard and looted cash of Rs. 7,48,600/- from the workshop.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. Name of petitioner transpired in this case during investigation
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6202 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026 2/2 only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ranjan Kumar. Save and except the same, there is no material on record to show the complicity of this petitioner in the alleged occurrence.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that name of petitioner transpired in this case during investigation and there is accusation that he, along with other accused persons, looted cash from the workshop. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent of similar nature.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials that haves surfaced during investigation and criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T