Ram Ekbal Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6510 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Ram Ekbal Singh son of Ram Shresth Singh 2.

Bindiya Devi wife of Ram Ekbal Singh Both resident of village-Narharpur, P.S. Jandaha, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Chandra Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation as per F.I.R. is that the daughter of the informant was studying at Patna in a coaching and she had friendship with one Navin Kumar and when she did not return on 27.05.2018 and on enquiry, he traced the mobile number of Navin Kumar and when they went to the village, he found Navin Kumar and his family members traceless and thereafter on enquiry from the villagers, they informed that the accused persons including the petitioners have killed his daughter and tried to cremate the dead-body and her dead-body was recovered in half burnt condition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6510 of 2019(3) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are father and mother of Navin Kumar and no specific allegation has been attributed against them.

Heard learned A.P.P. also, who opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and drawing my attention towards para-8 of the case diary, in which the witness has stated the same fact that the dead-body of Kripa Kumari was recovered in half burnt condition and the postmortem report shows that she was strangulated.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, rather they should surrender and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered on its own merit.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Amjad/- U T