Nilam Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2332 of 2024 ====================================================== Nilam Devi Wife of Late Ravindra Kumar Chaupal, Resident of ward no. 4 Lohra Rohtas, P.S. Bisfi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Secretary Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Labour Commissioner, Darbhanga Division Darbhanga. 3.
The In-charge Director, Bihar State Labour Welfare Committee, Madhubani 4.
The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
5.
The Sub-Divisional Officer Madhubani.
6.
The Block Development Officer, Bisfi District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sitaram Yadav, GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ(s), direction(s) for direction order(s), to the respondent authorities to make payment of the compensation amount in the light of the order dated 03.11.2022 passed in Claim Case No. 40510114102203743 by the District Public Claim Redressal Officer, Madhubani to the petitioner along with statutory interest @ 12% per annum and to grant any other consequential benefits for which petitioner may found entitled in accordance with law."
Patna High Court CWJC No.2332 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted, by referring to paragraph no. 7 of the counter affidavit filed in the present case on behalf of the respondents no. 2 & 3, that the compensation amount to the tune of Rs. one lac has already been paid to the petitioner through her bank account no. 32113692394 as per the provisions contained under Clause 6(1) of the Bihar Shatabdi Unorganized Sector Workers and Artisans Social Security Scheme, 2011, hence the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3.
This Court finds that the aforesaid aspect of the matter has not been refuted by the petitioner inasmuch as no rejoinder affidavit has been filed.
4.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as having been rendered infructuous.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U