Shailesh Anand And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12713 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Shailesh Anand Son of Late Bashist Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Babura, P.S. - Barhara, District - Bhojpur Ara. 2.

Bharat Sharma Son of Late Sitab Mistry Resident of Village - Babura, P.S. - Barhara, District - Bhojpur Ara.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Vishweswaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patn 4.

The Managing Director, Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Ltd. Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Niga 5.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara.

6.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Bhojpur, Ara. 7.

The National Highway Authority of India, G - 586 Sector - 10 Dwarka, New Delhi Pin Code No. 110075.

8.

The General Manager National Highway Authority Krishnapuri D/23 Patna Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy-Gp18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners though the State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of order/orders.

direction/directions for commanding the respondent authority as well as National

Patna High Court CWJC No.12713 of 2016(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 Highway Authority of India Delhi (Respondent No.7) and National Highway Authority of India Boring Road Krishnapuri, Patna (Respondent no.8) and District Magistrate Ara (respondent no.5) to decide the issue of alignment in Babura Dorigunj Approach route for which the representation is pending in compliance of the order dated 29.03.2016 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12573 of 2015 by Hon'ble High Court.

3. Learned State counsel submits that the matter the matter was listed and since no one appeared, it was passed over. He further submits that in any case the matter seems to have become infructuous.

4. Be that as it may, since the petitioners has chosen not to represent, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U