Patna High CourtCWJC/10874/2017disposed

Nityanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-11Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10874 of 2017 =========================================================== Nityanand Singh, Son of Late Bhagwan Singh, Resident of Village-Khankulipur, Police Station-Arwal, District-Arwal. At Present Chairman Arwal Nagar Parishad, Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Nagar Palika Administration-cum-Addl. Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Vigilance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Arwal, District-Arwal.

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Arwal, District-Arwal.

7. The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad Arwal, District-Arwal.

8. Ramakant Kumar, Son of Sri Tribhuvan Singh, Resident of Village-Ahiyapur, P.S. + District-Arwal.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S. B. K. Mangalam, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, G.A. 3 For the Vigilance :

Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the A.G.

Mr. Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No. 7 :

Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 11-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; State; Nagar Parishad, Arwal and the Vigilance.

2. It appears that the Vigilance has submitted a detailed enquiry report pursuant to which consequential follow up actions have been taken.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the Court can only observe that it shall be open to the petitioner to take necessary steps,

Patna High Court CWJC No.10874 of 2017 dt.11-08-2017 2/2 in accordance with law, for safeguarding his interest and for any grievance, which he may have in the matter, before the appropriate forum, at the appropriate stage.

4. The writ petition stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U