← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3602/2019disposed

Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-07-03Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3602 of 2019 ====================================================== Ranjana Kumari aged about 38 (Female), W/o Pankaj Kumar Jha Resident of Village-Shahpur Bhore Jairam, Ward No.12, P.S.-Khanpur Distt.-Samastipur at Present Mukhiya of Bhore Jai Ram Panchayat Block-Khanpur Distt.- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate Samastipur 2.

The Chairman Of Selection Committee Cum Distt. Magistrate Samastipur Bihar 3.

The D.D.C. Samastipur(Dy. Development Commissioner, Samastipur) Bihar 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Divisional Samastipur Bihar 5.

The Distt. Supply Officer Samastipur Bihar 6.

Kumari Suman W/o Baiju Kumar Sahni Resident of Village-Bhorejairampur Ward No.-8 Block-P.S.-Khanpur Distt.-Samastipur ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar No1 For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (SC4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 It appears that the petitioner has filed a representation on 03.12.2018 before the Chairman of the District Selection Committee cum District Magistrate, Samastipur as contained in Annexure '4' to the writ application and is seeking consideration thereof.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the prayer of the petitioner.

In the given facts and circumstances of the case the District Magistrate, Samatipur is directed to look into the representation of the petitioner as contained in Annexure '4' to

Patna High Court CWJC No.3602 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 the writ application and take a decision thereon within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

In case, any order adverse to the interest of the private respondent is proposed to be passed, an opportunity of hearing must be given to her.

This Writ Application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U