Chunnu Singh @ Chunu Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10730 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2023 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== CHUNNU SINGH @ CHUNU KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Anil Singh @ Late Anil Kumar Singh Resident of Village-Ojhaul, P.S.-Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Jha, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2024 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with other co-accused persons came on a motorcycle and assaulted Bishundeo Sahni and Rishikesh Kumar and during assault, petitioner fired twice upon them and fled away from the place of occurrence. It is further alleged that two empty cartridges and one Glamor Motorcycle bearing registration no. BR07AJ 5832 have been recovered at the place of occurrence.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10730 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. No injured person took the name of petitioner. He has been made accused in the present case merely on suspicion. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as name of the petitioner has been transpired in the present case merely on suspicion, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 489 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T