Dilip Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40018 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2014 Thana -BASANTPUR District- SIWAN ====================================================== Dilip Singh Son of Sri Lalbabu Singh R/o Village Sikkati Bhikham, P.S. Mashrakh, District Saran Chapra .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuradha Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 10-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of IPC. Allegation is that during raid the petitioner and the co-accused were found sitting in a maruti car and both of them were apprehended by the police personnel. They could not show the ownership of the vehicle.
It is submitted that the petitioner had gone somewhere by a motorcycle which belonged to his cousin brother. The motorcycle was not a stolen property. After investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence. The petitioner has been in custody
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40018 of 2014 (3) dt.10-02-2015 2/2 since 4.7.2014.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner has also criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan/court concerned in Basantpur P. S. Case No. 200 of 2014 after framing of charge with following conditions:-
1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.
2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T