← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1617/2017dismissed

Raju Ranjan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar , Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2022-12-13Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1617 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- Buxar ====================================================== Raju Ranjan Prasad, Son of Late Nathuni Prasad, Resident of Village & Mohalla- Nawada, District- Bhojpur.(Arrah) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The State Of Bihar , Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 2.The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.The Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur (Arrah). 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur. 5.The Officer-in-Charge, Nawada, Bhojpur (Arrah). 6.The Concern Officer, Kalyan Vibhag, Bojpur(Arrah). 7.The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

8.Ram Nath Prasad, son of Late Radha Prasad, Mohalla- Nawada Chowk, Arrah, P.O. and P.s. Jawahar Tola Mill road, Nawada, Arrah, District - Bhojpur(Arrah) ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.

Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, learned AC to AAG-3 appears for the State.

This case has been lodged for a direction to the respondents to institute an F.I.R. against the private respondents. Perusal of the writ application shows that the petitioner has moved directly before this Court for lodging of the F.I.R. without following the procedure prescribed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Priyanka Srivastava & Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. reported in (2015)6 SCC 287. Keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh and

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1617 of 2017(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 Ors. reported in (2008)2 SCC 409, this Court is not inclined to entertain this application. It is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U