Subhash Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5418 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARA KOTHI District- Purnia ====================================================== Subhash Mahto S/o Sri Dukhi Mahto, R/o village- Murballa, P.S.- Barhra, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :
Pushpa Sinha.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Special Excise Case No.894 of 2019, arising out of Barhara P.S. Case No.225 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
It has been alleged that 05 litres of country made liquor has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5418 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Purnea in connection with Special Excise Case No.894 of 2019, arising out of Barhara P.S. Case No.225 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T