Laddu Ray @ Ranjeet Ray @ Rang Jee Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32501 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -194 Year- 2013 Thana - MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) =================================================== Satendra Sah @ Satendra Kumar Sah Son of Late Shiv Murat Sah Resident of Village - Bharadhih, P.S.- Kochas (Parsauth), Distict - Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No. 38093 of 2014 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -194 Year- 2013 Thana - MOHANIA District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) =================================================== Laddu Ray @ Ranjeet Ray @ Rang Jee Ray Son of Amresh Ray Village - Lilwacha, P.S. - Dinara, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.32501 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Najir Ansari (APP) (In Cr.Misc. No.38093 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Suresh Pd. Singh (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 03.
19.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.
The Petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that there is no direct material
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32501 of 2014 (3) dt.19-01-2015 against the Petitioners and their son/mother respectively undertakes their responsibility, let them be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 194 of 2013 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners and the other bailor shall be the son/mother of the Petitioners respectively. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioners.
(ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32501 of 2014 (3) dt.19-01-2015 represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled. In view of the antecedents of the Petitioners, the Petitioners are directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabhua within fifteen days of their release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the Petitioners will be kept under watch in this period by the superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the Petitioners before the court concerned. Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T