Mustaque Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11055 of 2016 =========================================================== Mustaque Ahmad, son of Shahabudin, resident of Village- Sukharbaliya, P.S.- Hari, District- Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Primary, Secondary and Adult Education (Human Resources Development Department), Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Education, Department of Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Secretary, Primary Education, Department of Primary, Secondary and Adult Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Rohtash.

5. The Block Development Officer, Kochas, District- Rohtas.

6. The Block Education Officer, Kochas, District- Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Verma, AAG-5 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. After series of litigation up to the Apex Court, appointments have been made against the vacancy of 34540/- posts of Assistant Teachers. Out of the post of 34540/-, on account of nonjoining, approximately 2413 posts of Assistant Teachers have remained vacant. Thereafter the Commission has started process for preparing the final select list for filling up the vacant post of 2413, out of 34540. In fact the Commission has invited objections by publishing notice in the newspaper and the aggrieved persons have submitted their objections.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11055 of 2016 dt.23-04-2018 2/2

3. The Commission is expected to consider the objection objectively and take final decision in the matter of preparation of select list of the candidates.

4. In the event, the respondents do not consider the case of the petitioner and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the final select list prepared by the Commission for filling of 2413 post of Assistant Teachers, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance.

5. With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date25.04.2018 Transmission Date