Phulo Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30688 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2016 Thana -DAGARUA District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Phulo Devi, Wife of Gopal Rishi, Resident of Bhamara, P.S. Dagarua, District Purnea.

2. Kushumlal Rishi Son of Jai Lal Rishi Resident of Bhamara, P.S. Dagarua, District Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kumari Ritambhara, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Roy (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER 06-10-2016 Phulo Devi, petitioner no.1, seeks anticipatory bail in the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in respect of Dagarua P.S. Case No.23 of 2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is specific allegation in the ferdbeyan that it is the petitioner, who induced Ramya Kumari aged 15 years to leave the house for doing labour, but the girl Ramya Kumari did not return back in the evening.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30688 of 2016 (4) dt.06-10-2016 2/2 Keeping in view the allegations against the petitioner, I do not find that it is a case for grant of anticipatory bail. The application is, therefore, dismissed. (Hemant Gupta, J.) Sunil/- U T