← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7401/2025bail granted

Suraj Kumar @ Surya Narayan Sah @ Suraj Narayan Sah @ Suraj Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7401 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2024 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ DistrictMadhepura ====================================================== 1.

SURAJ KUMAR @ SURYA NARAYAN SAH @ SURAJ NARAYAN SAH @ SURAJ KUMAR SAH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SAH R/O VILLAGEBAIJNATHPUR,WARD NO-06,P.S-UDAKISHUNGANJ,DISTRICTMADHEPURA.

2.

NEERAJ KUMAR @ NEERAJ KUMAR SAH S/O LATE VISHWANATH SAH R/O VILLAGE-BAIJNATHPUR,WARD NO-06,P.SUDAKISHUNGANJ,DISTRICT-MADHEPURA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Co-operative extension officer, Udakishunganj Madhepura ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mr. Atul Kumar Mr. Dhandev Kumar Ms. Isha Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 333 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The learned APP for the State, at the outset,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7401 of 2025(4) dt.02-07-2025 2/3 submits that offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted against the petitioners carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that when the FIR was instituted, at that time, the police did not issue notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. as such, the petitioners had to move before this Court seeking anticipatory bail and this Court by an order dated 22.03.2025 granted no coercive action against the petitioners.

5.

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

6. The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the state of Bihar) and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7401 of 2025(4) dt.02-07-2025 3/3 strictly adheres to the directions contained in the the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T