Mithilesh Mahto v. Mosmat Chandrakala Devi And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Revision No.139 of 2016 ====================================================== Mithilesh Mahto Son of Late Shamo Mahto resident of village - Ladipur Ghir, P.S. Patori, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Mosmat Chandrakala Devi Wife of Late Nageshwar Tiwari

2. Santosh Kumar Tiwari Son of Late Nageshwar Tiwari Both are residents of village and Post Shahpur Undi, P.S. Patori, District Samasipur

3. Chandra Shekhar Tiwari Son of Late Ramashray Tiwari

4. Sujit Tiwari Son of Late Moleshwar Tiwari

5. Mosmat Chandrama Devi Wife of Late Mohan Tiwari

6. Prabhunath Tiwari Son of Late Mohan Tiwari O.P. No. 3 to 6 are residents of village and Post Shahpur Undi, P.S. Patori, District - Samastipur

7. Smt. Usha Devi Wife of Sri Bindeshwar Sah

8. Suresh Sah Son of Bishambhar Sah Both are residents of village Lodipur Ghir, Post Shahpur Undi, P.S. Patori, District - Samastipur

9. Brahmdeo Tiwari Son of Late Nageshwar Tiwari resident of village and Post Shahpur Undi, P.S. Patori, District Samastipur .... .... Opposite parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhavesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 15-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The defendant is the petitioner in this revision application against the order by which the learned court below has rejected the petition dated 09.05.2013 filed by the defendantpetitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. After considering the submission and perusal of the impugned order, this Court does not find that the learned court below has committed any error or illegality in passing the

Patna High Court C.R. No.139 of 2016 (4) dt.15-05-2017 2/2 impugned order.

This revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. (V. Nath, J) Vats/- U