← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11965/2016disposed

Sita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-10Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11965 of 2016 =========================================================== Sita Kumari, Wife of Anil Prasad, resident of village- Lakkhichak, P.S- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Member, District Teacher's Appointment Appellate Authority, DistrictNalanda at Biharsharif.

4. The Distirct Magistrate-cum- District Officer, Nalanda at Biahrsharif.

5. The District Education Officer, Nalanda at Biharsharif.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda at Biharsharif.

7. The Block Development Officer, Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

8. The Block Education Officer, Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Neerpur, Block- Noorsarai, DistrictNalanda.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Neerpur, Block- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court seeking implementation of the order dated 28.01.2016 passed by the District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Nalanda in Review Petition arising out of Appeal No. 6 of 2012, by which there is a direction to pay salary to the petitioner.

3. Today, supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent no. 2, in which it has been stated that

Patna High Court CWJC No.11965 of 2016 dt.10-04-2017 2/2 against the order dated 28.01.2016, an appeal has been filed before the State Tribunal on 30.03.2017.

4. In view of the aforesaid, in the considered opinion of the Court, the order dated 28.01.2016, having been assailed by the State authorities in appeal before the State Tribunal, no further order can be passed in the present proceeding.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to contest the appeal filed by the authorities before the State Tribunal.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U