Dilip Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9313 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dilip Yadav S/O Jangal Yadav R/O Village- Kanakpur, P.S.- Sakri, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Renu Kumari, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sakri P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024 dated 15.03.2024, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that due to land dispute between the parties, the petitioner along with co-accused is alleged to have assaulted father-in-law of the informant with an iron rod on his head due to which he sustained head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9313 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 2/3 in this case. It is submitted that the present case is counter blast of Sakri P.S. Case No. 44 of 2024 which has been lodged by one Anita Devi under Sections 341, 307, 354 and other allied sections against the husband, father-in-law and other family members of the informant. It is submitted that though the allegation against the petitioner is specific but the nature of injury mentioned in the impugned order is simple. It is also submitted that date of occurrence is 06.03.2024 but the present F.I.R. has been lodged on 15.03.2024, after 9 days of occurrence without any plausible reason of delay and the petitioner's side has lodged F.I.R. on 10.03.2024. It is further submitted that petitioner's side has also sustained injuries and the present case has been lodged only to save the skin. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9313 of 2025(2) dt.06-03-2025 3/3 Sakri P.S. Case No. 50 of 2024, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Madhubani, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C..
(Khatim Reza, J) prabhat/- U T